Login          Create Membership






 

“Standards in the top achieving countries were focused, rigorous and coherent.  U.S. state standards generally are not.” 

Bill Schmidt, Michigan State University

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The standard on the right is a 7th grade social studies example. This standard is very open ended and will probably be bounded by the teachers available time and personal interest. The social studies teacher has this standard to compare to the others for the class and estimate the time that could be budgeted to cover this standard. Then the standard needs to be built out in order to define exactly the content details that will be covered. To assist with this, teachers have text books, possibly curriculum from last year or from another teacher, and descriptions and released items from the EOY tests.

One approach to the build out is construction of a content outline as pictured. Assuming that this outline covers the topics intended by the standard, the structure would be repeated for each of the five areas. But as shown, this outline is not content, but just finer grained topic areas which themselves need to be broken down. But as you proceed with this task, you soon realize that there will not be enough time to cover all this material that is unfolding. And taking this standard with the others for this class, you have estimated this needs to be a 10 to 12 session unit.

By using the text books, typical content areas can be found and by using the test materials, specific content can be determined. The scope of the content indicted by the standard is huge and cannot be taken literally. The teacher will need to decide what to teach and what to skip.

And on the assessment side of the equation, test item writers are going through the same private process. And while some test items are disclosed, there is no assurance to the teacher that assessment is confined to the disclosed content, only the totality of the content specified by the standard. There is a relationship between standards, curriculum and assessments, but not true alignment.

Detail Example Pages

Related Pages

Learn More

To learn more about how the Aligned·By·Design Initiative enables improved schools and student achievement, please contact us.

Enabling Common Core State Standards Initiative Success

State and local administrators and teachers recognize that the pending disparities between the common core state standards and existing state content standards, the formal and taught curriculum, and assessments in the day-to-day classroom activities are significant and serious... more

 

No state has assured the alignment of its classroom instruction and teaching materials to their content standards and assessments. The lack of a truly aligned state model has consistently limited state, school district and teacher efforts to achieve student learning... more

  Sign up for the Newsletter

  Make a difference

  Contact Us

 



    
© 2009 Aligned•By•Design Initiative
All Rights Reserved